This is default featured slide 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

Showing posts with label Strategy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Strategy. Show all posts

Saturday, 24 August 2013

Immanuel Kant and Business Strategy: why you need to be a critical thinker in business


Of recent I took up an interest in a German philosopher of the late 18th century: Immanuel Kant. His much acclaimed paper; "what is enligthenment?" is a beautiful piece encouraging readers to think for themselves. I found this particular excerpt beautiful and pertinent:

"Enlightenment is man's emergence from his self-incurred immaturity. Immaturity
is the inability to use one's own understanding without the guidance of another.
This immaturity is self-incurred if its cause is not lack of understanding, but
lack of resolution and courage to use it without the guidance of another. The
motto of enlightenment is therefore: Sapere aude! Have courage to use your own
understanding!"

I had a lively discussion with an acquaintance on critique yesterday. It was actually about whether we need critique at all? And I believe "yes" and a big one at that. We need critique everywhere. Critique is what makes the world a better place. Critique makes new and better products and critique is definitely a key component of business success. Critique provides you with great questions and makes you:
  • A better business thinker: what if?
  • A better innovator: how about?
  • And a better designer: why not?
I think as I explain below you need those question to build great companies, products and services.


Wednesday, 2 November 2011

Are you a strategic or wishful thinker?/or why you should guard against visioning!


By Patrick Mayoh

There is so much to read nowadays; even more to write about. I am just about to finish a newly released master piece by Richard Rumelt, Havard Doctor and Chair at the Anderson School of Management UCLA, on “Good and Bad Strategy[1]”. The book as the titles suggests initiates managers to the art of successful strategising.
Richard Rumelt himself has been dubbed the “Strategy’s strategist” by the Mc Kinsey Quarterly. He has consulted with the big names in the world and his book is actually very deep and deals with key questions on strategic building for organization. Much could actually be said about strategy but for this post I will just focus on visioning and why this is bad for your organization when it is done recklessly. Here I am going to share what I learned about the dangers of visioning.

Pop unto the website of any organization and go to the “about us” section where you are almost always likely to find:
  • · A Vision
  • · The Mission statement and
  • · Values


While there is nothing wrong with those concepts, do you not actually feel that sometimes they can be devoid of meaning? Not just for outsiders but even more for insiders. Most of the time what people call “strategy” is usually a combination of those three elements. Visioning has nothing to do with strategy.

Visioning is actually a brainchild of the “new thought movement” advocated by such managers as Jack Wech with quotes such as “ reaching for what appears to be the impossible”, or more recently with people like Peter Senge with his concept of “shared vision”. In a nutshell mobilizing people around a common goal unleashes tremendous potentials that will likely propel the organization to success in its industry. There is actually nothing with that; this can be confusing, unspecific and fluffy.

Confusing because making grand statements like “we will be the best company in the world” is actually useless, virtually everyone thinks the same. Those statements will never tell your workforce what you are aiming at. The big picture is actually a series of details that build up to give an organization a concrete image of where the company is headed. When you cannot as a manager or a leader offer a clearer path than visioning, you run the danger of making it difficult for your employees to understand your philosophy.

Unspecific because visioning does not actually tell your employees what you are trying to do, how you plan to beat your competitors, what avenue you want to follow to be the best or how you plan to achieve profit. Visioning only states goals or intentions without actually demonstrating how your organizations will meet the targets. Visioning is often as well a list of things to do but this does not amount to strategy either. Presenting a bullet point series of slides on a nicely designed power point document will not clarify what you plan to do as a business.

Lastly visioning can be quite fluffy. By that I mean those organizations that usually state the obvious as strategies. Take the example of this bank whose strategy is” our fundamental strategy is one of customer-centric intermediation”. Ok let us stop there a moment. Intermediation actually means receiving deposits from customers to lend them to borrowers; do you not think this is pretty much what all banks do? Fancy words on a document do not amount to a strategy. In a nutshell according to Richard Rumelt bad strategy is either one of those following:
  • · Fluff
  • · Failure to face the challenge
  • · Mistaking goals for strategy
  • · Bad strategic objectives


Which brings us to the next question; what is good strategy or how can you lay down a successful one? See you next week for that. I cannot wait to read your comments.



[1] http://www.amazon.co.uk/Good-Strategy-Bad-difference-matters/dp/1846684803/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1320246419&sr=8-1

Wednesday, 15 June 2011

Time to create your blue ocean: a quick guide to strategic rethinking


By Patrick Mayoh

It has been a quite while, I am fully aware of it. I recently went on a shopping spree on my best market place (Amazon) to order books with big hypes in the business community. One of those is “Blue ocean Strategy » of INSEAD BUSINESS SCHOOL’s professors W.Chan Ki and Renee Mauborgne. The book was so applauded that the two authors were duly rewarded with an academic unit within the prestigious business school bearing of course the same name as the title of the book: the Blue Ocean Strategy Institute”.
Well I read the book as well and I tell you what, this is probably the best one I have read on strategic thinking. Mostly because the authors espouse my idea that strategic thinking should adopt a reconstructionist rather than a structuralist approach to markets, industries and the competition, more on that a bit later.

Blue oceans make competitors useless

What is your perspective when it comes to your business environment? Are you and your strategic team always thinking about better ways to beat competitors, slice markets shares, differentiate, and focus? Sounds a bit like the Potter idea of competition doesn’t it?
There is nothing wrong with thinking about the competition and about ways to beat your competitors. But as long as your focus remains on them, you end up losing sight of what really matters to customers and how you could actually reinvent your industry or business sector.
This has been termed a “red ocean” where a “market gets crowded” because “prospects for profits and growth are reduced. Products become commodities, and cutthroat competition turns the red ocean bloody”. The book pontificates that no industry or company is permanent, there is always a way to turn your business environment around and the best way to do that is to make the competition useless or irrelevant by going around it.

The strategy canvas

This is what the book all comes down to. Creating a blue ocean will require you to four activities:
· Identify the key common factors of your industry/sector
· Eliminating those that do not really matter to customers
· Raising those that do matter to customers but are downplayed by your industry
· Create new ones (factors) to enhance your value proposition to an unprecedented level within your industry

1) Identify

Individual organizations might differ from one another but industries are usually associated with key commonalities. It is therefore your responsibility to find out which factors most characterize your industry and its relationship with customers. Such factors obviously will vary from one industry to another. Also most industries are usually very complex in their structures and although you might deliver the same products or services to customer, it is worthwhile to know where you stand in your industry. Take the automobile industry for example, a huge sector; you have those who compete for luxury like BMW, Mercedes and Chrysler to name just those few. And then you have those that compete on affordability like Ford, Honda and to some extent Toyota. So although these organizations belong to the same industry, they still operate in different strata. It is therefore critical to identify first your stratum within your industry and then list the factors that are common in that particular stratum before you embark on your blue ocean creation.

2) Eliminate

Once you know for sure the key factors that characterize your industry or the stratum along which you operate in your business sector it is important to spot the factors that do not matter to customers. Business leaders that are not willing to challenge existing boundaries within their industry are more likely to fail than those who question status quo.
This is how Ford became the leader in the Automobile industry in the early 1900s. While other hundreds automakers thought cars were meant to be luxuries and inaccessible to the common masses, Henry Ford built a car that was easy to drive, reliable and durable. As it indicated in a 1909 brochure “Watch the Ford go by. High priced quality in a Low priced car”. So it is time for you to challenge the existing boundaries within your sector and proceed to eliminate those that do not matter. Henry Ford eliminated the fact that cars were meant to be luxuries for the elite. What do you need to eliminate? What are those things or factors your customers do not really care about?

3) Raise

Once you have eliminated the factors that do not matter at all to your customers it is time find those that really matter. As the authors rightly suggest, innovation is not always linked to technology but to those elements your customers “value”. Once you raise the factors that really matter to them you win! This is what Dell actually did. True customers value impressive features and software applications on newly bought computers. But many even value more computers that are delivered faster to individuals’ specifications and wishes. So the purchasing and delivering experiences although greatly neglected by other manufacturers actually mattered to customers and Dell was quick to spot that, reducing the purchasing and delivery time to 4 days as opposed to 10 weeks for competitors.

4) Create

This is probably the gist of the blue ocean school of thought. Once you have identified, eliminated and raised factors that do not or do matter in your industry stratum, you can think of introducing factors that will make your competitors irrelevant and set you apart from the rest.
A word of caution, innovation is not only or always about technology but about introducing factors that add value to your overall customer satisfaction. Enhancing your value proposition will very much depend on those factors you add to your customers’ experience of your products/services and organisation.
Kinepolis just did that by adding a childcare service to its value proposition. Most people enjoy a good night out to the cinema but many parents find it difficult especially when the last minute baby-sitter is not available. So Kinepolis a chain of movie theaters in Belgium added childcare facilities to its cinemas allowing parents not to worry about children on a good night out, and was able to make competitors irrelevant.
Something of relevance here is also the fact that a blue ocean strategic thinking provides your organization with Focus, Divergence and a powerful Tagline. In a red ocean, companies compete along the same factors making it difficult for your organization to make profit/margins. With the creation of a blue ocean, the company sets itself apart by simultaneously eliminating/reducing, raising and creating new factors.

References

W. Chan Kim and Renee Mauborgne (2005) Blue Ocean Strategy: how to create uncontested market space and make the competition irrelevant Havard Business Review Press Boston Massachussetts

Friday, 4 March 2011

Why your business should think about web 2.0 technologies/social media?



Patrick Mayoh

Back to my geeky mood again! I have been reflecting about the impact of social media in our westernized societies, well not just the west but globally. I was thinking especially about the ways in which a business, say a start-up could fully reap the benefits of utilising those emerging means of communication to benefit a business/organization. Over the past two weeks my attention was caught by this article from MC Kinsey about a book by Stanford Marketing Profession Jennifer Aaker and marketing guru Andy Smith entitled “the dragon fly effect” on engaging customers or the general public through social media.
Interestingly, a couple of weeks ago I read about this research results from communications agency The Group, about twitter use by FTSE 100. According to findings almost half of those companies use twitter to engage with their publics and this is up from about 50% last year. If you add these figures to the 25% rise in Facebook use and 39% for YouTube, you start to get the big picture.
I believe your organization can benefit from social media use in the five following ways:
· There are a critical barometer of your company’s image and performance
· They will help you engage with customers in new ways
· It is probably one of the cheapest marketing strategies to implement
· They can bring organizational members closer

1) Another Barometer

Traditional ways of assessing whether people like or dislike your organization or are even aware or unaware of it is to monitor the press, the TV and Internet posts and articles. Embarking on social media use is also a critical and more refined way of doing the more of the same. As a starting point creating a Facebook or Twitter page will be a good way to know if your customers/fans have a good perception about your company and its activities in general. Although you cannot specifically tell if your company is liked from the number of Facebook or twitter followers you have, I think this is still a good starting point especially if you are a new start-up and you are still not getting enough coverage from mainstream media.

2) Engaging with Customers

Engaging with your customers goes beyond having numerous Facebook or Twitter fans. The big question is how your organizations use those followers to for example:
· Create new products/services
· Improve customer service
· Acquire new customers
· Expand to new markets
70% of executives interviewed by MC Kinsey in a global survey in 2007 have admitted to the fact that their organizations create more value for customers through web-based technologies. There are currently about more than 70 million bloggers (like myself) posting reviews about products and services according to MC Kinsey Quarterly (2010).
A couple of months ago Facebook freely marshalled 300,000 users to translate its website into 70 languages. The translation of the French version took just about....well a day. Procter and Gamble have set in place a social network of mums trying and reporting of their experience of using specific products for their babies. Like it or not the possibilities and opportunities are endless for your organization and it is time your PR team sat and thought about that.

3) It is very cheap to start with

Honestly the cost of setting a Facebook, twitter, Beebo or YouTube account is basically free. You will not have to convince your manager to spend more money. But you will have to highlight the specific objective of using such means of communication within your organization. The possibilities are endless especially for a new marketing campaign. Instead of paying a ridiculous amount of money to advertise your new insurance service on TV why not consider the possibility of using YouTube at a definitely lesser cost, virtually all companies have video messages of some sort ranging from interview preparation for university leavers to new products and services, so why should you not think likewise for your business?

4) What about starting a blog for your organization

Up to now we have just briefly looked at the external applications of Web 2.0 technologies. However corporate blogging is just another way to get people together within your company. It is all about creating a sense of community within your company, whereby people use your blog as a forum or a way to exchange perspective with your colleagues in a newer way. Therefore it could a good idea to set up one for your business and get your organization’s members to regroup for the benefit of your organization.

References

Steve Dinesen (February 2011) Almost half of FTSE 100 firms now use Twitter CITY AM 8 February 2011
Jacques Begin, Michael Chui and James Manyika (2010) Clouds, Big Data and smart assets: ten tech-enabled business trends to watch MC Kinsey Quarterly

Dan Singer (2010) The power of storytelling: What nonprofits can teach the private sector about social media Interview with Jennifer Aaker and Andy Smith on the Dragonfly effect MC Kinsey Quarterly

Friday, 11 February 2011

The Era of Cloud Computing – Five reasons why your organization needs to adopt it





Patrick Mayoh

I cannot tell why I am turning geeky these days. I had to choose between writing on cloud computing or web 2.0 technologies. The reason I guess is because I believe those two topics just show how much, more efficient IT systems in the future will boost productivity and increase profitability. Cloud computing is one of those IT applications that your organizations should be thinking about for five reasons:
· It is trendy
· It is cost-effective
· It is sustainable
· It is Accessible
· It boosts your team productivity

What is it?

Simply put according to Jacques Bughin et al (2010) in the MC Kinsey Quarterly, cloud computing consists of “accessing computer resources provided through networks rather than running software or storing data on a local computer”. Mell and Grance (2009) of the National Institute of Standards and Technology NIST provide a more comprehensive definition as they define it as “a model for enabling convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources (e.g., networks, servers, storage, applications, and services) that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort or service provider interaction”. Let us see why you need it in your organization and how this will change and possibly improve your business as a whole.

It is trendy

This is one of the hot IT topics nowadays. It is one of those applications that will set the pace of the future and will be widely used by organization for its many benefits. It is gaining such momentum that the MC Kinsey Quarterly devoted a section to it in its article on the top “ten-tech enabled business trends to watch”. Big pharmaceutical giants like Genentech have begun to reap the benefits of cloud computing, as this enables them to design and create documents and spreadsheets from enabled web browsers like Google for example.

IT is cost-effective

Your company spends a lot of money on a yearly basis just to acquire software licences and purchase or maintain computer servers. Cloud computing means your business has a unique opportunity to save in capital investments. If your organization invests in a private cloud, the need to renew say your Microsoft Office licence or your Anti-Virus every year will become irrelevant. Likewise the need to buy servers to support your internal network will also disappear. Cloud computing simply means that if you invest in a private cloud for example, all you need is a reliable and fast enough working Internet connection to access all your files and documents on the “cloud” from your laptop or smart phone. So you can even think about getting rid of all your licences and servers now cloud computing is the new way.

It is Sustainable

Sustainability is one of those terms everyone has become so passionate about in the business world. It is all about how we use natural resources without preventing next generations from doing the same. I think Jim Wallis (2010) gets it better than anyone else. In his book “rediscovering values” he introduces a concept called “the seventh generation” principle whereby American Founding Fathers in the past would make decisions based on how these would affect the next seven generations. According to MC Kinsey Quarterly, the Electricity needed to power IT structures around the world generates greenhouse gases emissions of the scale of countries like Argentina or the Netherlands. This is set to increase by fourfold in 2020. This alone is a good reason why cloud computing is necessary for your business. No need to make capital investments in items such as USB drives, CDs, Servers and paper to name just a few. Because all IT applications can be organized, shared, processed and saved on the cloud using your normal Internet connection; there will not be any need to invest in hardware equipments anymore.

It is accessible

It just used to be something people vaguely knew about but just as Jimmy Harris, Managing director of Accenture Cloud services observes, “More and more money is being allocated to exploring and implementing cloud services; believe it, it is gonna happen and it is gonna continue to evolve”. This is because major software companies like Microsoft and Google to name just those two giants have already developed solutions for clients enabling them to access cloud computing services. Microsoft has devoted a whole platform on its website explaining and clearly outlining the benefits of the cloud for organizations. This just shows that nowadays this is an investment many organizations can venture to make.

It boosts your team productivity

Cloud computing means the IT applications containing your files, spreadsheets and documents can be accessed from anywhere and faster than before. Therefore enhancing your team mobility, flexibility and speeding up the way you deliver services and products to customers or clients.
Maybe you will even cut capital investments in infrastructure like buildings. Because data can be accessed anywhere some of your staff might not have to come to work Monday to Friday. Most of their tasks could be completed from the comfort of their sofas at homes just using their normal internet connection to work on projects.
Also projects could be treated simultaneously as staff can access the same files and documents from the cloud boosting the flexibility and productivity of your team while increasing the speed at which you deliver your services to clients. In an ideal scenario you could get team members from Europe, Asia and Central America to work say on a service or project that is meant for a client in Africa. And this could be done simultaneously using just the cloud and provided those team members can access it from where they are using a normal internet connection.
In a nutshell this is why you can benefit from using cloud computing services. Feel free to leave any comment (I would really appreciate if you did as it only helps me to improve and write about more relevant topics).

References

Jacques Bughin, James Manyika and Michael Chui (2010) ten-tech enabled business trends to watch MC Kinsey Quarterly
Jim Wallis (2010) rediscovering values: on Wall Street, Main Street and your street Howard Books New-York
Peter Mell and Tim Grance The NSIT definition of cloud computing

Tuesday, 1 February 2011

Does your organization/department think 20/80?


By Patrick Mayoh

I don’t know if like me you felt disappointed about the last World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland. I waited for the whole event to conclude, hoping I would have something really interesting to write about. The theme in itself “turning risk into possibility” was very evocative of Davos’ organizers’ willingness to map the way out from a fragile to a steady recovery. Instead the summit ended on a very strange note. Really what is the use of a week of discussions and debates if all in all what we learn and already know is:
· The recovery will continue to be fragile throughout the West, uncertain in Spain, Portugal and Italy and steady and gaining even more momentum in emerging markets (China, India Singapour, Malaysia, Indonesia.....)
· That unemployment continues to grow and needs to be reduced in the West
· That we cannot speak of a G20 anymore but rather of a G0 where individual countries cater to national economic interests to the detriment of regional or global ones
· Finally that the rising food/commodity inflation will only continue to affect many nations in emerging countries possibly resulting in mass riots across many countries
So I will write about something different and hope you guys find it useful because this is a principle that I particularly enjoy using when faced with a complex situation and I guess this is one of those principles that make problems easier to solve and to understand. So let us speak about the 20/80 principle.

What is 20/80?

According to Rasiel and Friga authors of “The MC Kinsey Mind” this is one of the “greatest truths of business”. 20/80 simply means that 80 percent of an event under study will usually be generated by 20 percent of the examples analyzed. The Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto is traditionally considered the father of this rule. While undertaking a study of the economy of his country he realized that 20 percent of the population possessed 80 percent of the land. Subsequently he observed that 80 percent of his peas just came from 20 percent of his plants. Following from those observations he concluded that “for any series of elements under study, a small fraction of the number of elements usually accounts for a large fraction of the effect”. The same applies to life. 80 percent of the clothes you wear just account for 20 cent the total clothes contained in your wardrobe; and 80 percent of the information you get from TV, Radio, Internet or the papers just come from 20 percent of available information.
Actually when analysing a problem or a situation you will always find some cases of 20/80 that explain why your sales are up, why your team is under performing, why you are underutilizing your resources or why you cannot increase your market share just to name a few instances.
Besides the 20/80 does not necessarily always mean 20/80, it could be 40/60 or something else, what it does mean is that a large proportion of an event can usually be attributed to a smaller proportion of the elements accounting for it (the event).

Benefits of the 20/80 approach

There are many possibilities you could think about when reflecting on the possibility of applying the 20/80 approach to your organization, department or unit. Here we will just look at a few cases and see how the 20/80 rule can be applied and used to drive and increase performance.

For Marketing

When it comes to marketing 20/80 might just mean that 20 percent of your customers account for 80 percent of your revenues. Losing those critical customers might mean a disaster for your business. The one-size-fits-all approach in this sense becomes meaningless as your marketing department should devote its most critical resources on the customers that matter. In fact Curry J. And Curry A. Came up with a marketing model that perfectly exemplifies the rule of 20/80; the Curry Pyramid is a marketing model that recommends segmenting customers according to their profitability to the business.
It is built around the premise that companies that can attract and retain their most profitable customers are likely to be the winners. Traditionally marketing is all about attracting specific clients but the Curry Pyramid actually emphasizes on attracting the most profitable ones not just the most relevant. Therefore, supposing your marketing department thinks about adopting a 20/80 approach, a good point to start will be to investigate where your profits come from and who are the generators of those profits. Say you are a business selling consumer electronics.
Although you have panoply of customers ranging from teenagers to mums at home, you need to find out which of those categories of customers bring more revenues to your store and allocate marketing resources accordingly. In a nutshell 80 percent of your marketing budget should be ideally devoted to 20% of your customers, not literally though as I said before, what it signifies is a marketing department cannot devote the same attention to all customers, actually some customers actually make you lose rather than win money!

How you use your resources

Also what you really need comes into question when you think of the 20/80 rules. Have you considered the possibility of saving cost when you really look into the resources that are actually needed say to manufacture a product or provide a service to customers? Is it possible that you don’t need certain resources in your company at all? Are there elements you could simply get rid of to achieve cost saving? Do you actually need more computers? Have you considered the possibility of cloud computing or cloud networking? When you begin to critically look around your organization, department or unit it is possible that you will begin to see the big picture and possibly spot a few occurrences of 20/80 that need to be addressed to increase profits.

Getting more out of your staff

When you think of the 20/80 principle you can also think about the possibility that maybe 80% of your work gets done by only 20% of your workforce. In which case the first question that comes to mind is “why?” and following from that what could be done to increase the productivity of the underperforming workforce. Maybe you do not need all the people that work for you currently and the opportunity to adjust and retain those that really matter to your organizations while motivating and encouraging those who could bring more to your business will usually present itself.

Dealing with the information overload

I was bemused by the title of one of MC KINSEY’s article “recovering from the information overload”. The article suggests that multi-tasking is actually counter-productive rather than beneficial to an individual. Actually according to a study conducted by Bawden and Robinson (2010) two-third of managers under study have admitted that information overload have actually lessened their job satisfaction while damaging their personal relationships. Another study conducted by Asplund et al (2010) have discovered that when we switch from tasks especially those of a particular complexity we take 30% longer to complete them and make as twice many mistakes. In a world overloaded with information, analyses and report, applying the 20/80 principle definitely make sense. Your organization does not need to have access to all possible information, they are too many out there, and instead you should decide what you think is really relevant to your Business rather than trying to know everything. Do you really need to have a look at that report or figures? How do they even relate to your department or organization? Will they help your business at all? Those are some of the questions needed in the 21 st century overloaded with all sorts of information. MC KINSEY review suggests the 3Fs:
· Focus on what is relevant
· Filter out what you do not need to know
· Forget what is totally irrelevant to your business
That is proper 20/80 actually.

References

Curry, J. And Curry, A. (2000) The Customer Marketing Method: How to implement and profit from customer relationship management, New York: Free Press.
David Bawden and Lyn Robinson, “The dark side of information: Overload, anxiety, and other paradoxes and pathologies,” Journal of Information Science, Volume 20, Number 10, pp. 1–12.
Christopher L. Asplund, Paul E. Dux, Jason Ivanoff, and RenĂ© Marois, “Isolation of a central bottleneck of information processing with time-resolved fMRI,” Neuron, 2006, Volume 52, Number 6, pp. 1109–20.
Ethan M. Rasiel and Paul N. Friga (2002) The MC KINSEY MIND Mc Graw Hill

Sunday, 16 January 2011

What 21st century company should know about change management!



"In the introduction to my last post I mentioned an article I had read from the latest edition of Reader's Digest by management guru Belden Menkus a former employee at management consultancy powerhouse Mc Kinsey about Change Management. Hope you enjoy it and leave a few comments about how you think change should be implemented within organizations today"

Remember when a change was as good as a rest? When life stayed pretty much the same, year in, year out? Back then, if you wanted to perk things up a bit, you’d just shift a few elements around—maybe have a break or take up a hobby. But these days it feels as if life is in a constant state of change, with very little staying as it was. The last thing you probably need is yet more change.
What’s more, because so many things are changing at the same time, they often combine in unexpected ways. Who’d have thought, for example, that steps taken by governments to promote home ownerships, and businesses offering ways to make that affordable, would lead to financial meltdown, the credit crunch and the nationalisation of major banks?
Or that an ash from an Icelandic volcano most of us had never heard of would cause the Europe-wide disruption to everything from food exports to taxi services?
Or that Apple, once just a computer manufacturer would become a major player in the music business, mobile phones, and now e-readers—all in just a few years.
These are examples of what I call the Age of Discontinuity; when what happens next feels almost disconnected from what has gone before.
As a result, the future seems increasingly unpredictable. This can create problems for businesses—lost opportunities, misguided investments—which is why so many of them, big and small, are wrestling with the issues. But how did we get to this point?

The Age of stability: 1920s-early 1960s

For businesses, this was a slower, simpler time. Business was mainly local, because life was local. Information processing tools—from typewriters to adding machines—were mechanical. Record keeping and communications were largely paper-based: letters, newspapers, memos, forms, files. It was a time when someone could have fallen asleep at their desk for two decades and woken up to find that the way business was done hadn’t changed much.

The Age of change: mid-60s – early 1980s

Somewhere around the mid 1960s, things shifted. Computers and photocopiers became widespread, making it faster, easier and cheaper to create, manipulated and communicate information. Business leaders had to deal with social change and shifting values. Japan and other countries, started to make their presence felt in the global economy, not just as sources of raw materials and cheap labours but as competitors and innovators, too. At the same time—both driving and driven by these changes—came academic theories about strategy, organization, and change itself: theories that in many cases are still influencing how businesses operate.

The Age of Acceleration: Mid-80s – early 2000s

By the mid-1980s, change—once difficult and time-consuming—had become easier: something we knew how to do and did all the time. Computer no longer remote, were now on your desk and in your home. Mobile phones broke the link between work and workplace. Mass containerisation of shipping and road transport made fast global supply chains possible. New business models—such as First Direct’s online banking—started to bypass traditional methods of sales and distribution. Not surprisingly more new theories arose to address the new challenges—and again many are still in use today.

The Age of Discontinuity: mid-00s – now

More recently, things shifted again—with the internet at the centre of the change. For many people, a laptop has become where they work, much more than any other physical place. The Internet is also where more and more of us shop, learn and interact. Thanks to Broadband access, we can now become “experts” in medicine, law, culture, and politics. Innovations such as the IPod have changed how we acquire, use, and pay for music and other entertainment. Meanwhile, globalisation continues, as China and India become major players in the world economy. The recent financial meltdown demonstrates how rapidly things change and what an unpredictable world we live in.

So where do we go from here?

Most current middle managers started work in the age of acceleration and most senior leaders started in the age of change—but the organisations they joined were often built on practices from the age of stability! Many management patterns established in all these periods are still in use today. But the challenges of the age of Discontinuity are very different, and very different approaches are needed.

Update your mind models

Everyone has a “mind model” of how the world works, which we create from what we see around us and what people, tell us. We can’t often explain the model to others and rarely question it ourselves. Yet every day, we make decisions based on it, usually without much conscious thought.
In a time when things didn’t change, this wasn’t a problem. Now our thinking can soon become out of date. Most of us, for instance can recall when photographic evidence was conclusive enough to convict. But now that we know how easy it is to manipulate photos, a “seeing is believing” mind model is out of date.
Or take a straightforward business example. I once worked with some clients who wanted new customers for their core product. They believed they made most of their money from that product, and everything else they sold had been introduced to keep core customers happy, rather than to make money. But when the market took a downturn, we took a hard look at where their profits really came from. It turned out very few were from the core products, and most were from the add-ons. They’ve now shifted their focus.
In earlier times, businesses could survive with a top team that didn’t examine whether their mind models matched reality. Things changed slowly enough to allow these models to be updated in the same way they’d been constructed in the first place: bit by bit.
But that drip-feed approach will no longer work. Businesses need once clear, up-to-date view of the world—which means re-examining their approach and seeing where it needs refreshing.

Create new meaning

“Meaning” might sound a bit fluffy, but it’s vital for making sense of what’s happening. Many businesses have some sort of mission statement, which is meant to create a sense of purpose of the organisation as a whole. But a different level of meaning is needed in today’s uncertain times.
It’s what I call “Us, plus”, and it’s more manifesto than mission statement: “The world is this way, but it could be that way, which is better, so we’re going to help make it that way. Oh, and we think can make some money while we’re doing so. We’re doing something valuable, so we ought to get rewarded”
In fact when old certainties are breaking down, creating new meaning is the key to leadership. With it, employees, customers and suppliers will be engaged and supportive—even when mistakes happen. Without it, a business can end up like BP: attacked by politicians and public because it’s seen as having focussed on profit at the expense of the bigger picture.

Be quick on your feet

Businesses won’t survive if they can’t respond to a fast changing world. Yet most use an inherently slow approach. Management ask a small group to figure out what to do (usually in secret). Sometime later, they hear the recommendations and decide what to do. They then tell the staff.
If you’ve ever been in an organization that’s had consultants in, you know how it works: months of data-gathering and huge reports, before the answer is communicated from on high. But employees often resist change if they haven’t been part of developing the solution. Besides, information often now often changes faster than it can be gathered and analysed.
Some business leaders are using better approaches. They accept that you can’t analyse everything. They involve more people inside their company. They reach out to anyone, anywhere, who can help identify workable solutions and move them forward.
In today’s world, you don’t have the luxury of figuring it all out first, then implementing the answer. In the age of Discontinuity, an agile, open mind is the biggest asset of all.
  1. Belden Menkus has advised business leaders around the world for 25 years
  2. Republished from the January 2011 edition of the Reader's Digest (page 131-136)

Monday, 5 July 2010

Swot: asking the right questions

By Patrick Mayoh

The term SWOT (strenghts, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) is probably one of the most used acronym in management circles. This framework was introduced between the late 1960s and the early 1970s by a management consultancy from the Stanford Research Institute ;Albert S Humpfrey.

When properly used and implemented by managers Swot has the potential of providing focus and a clear sense of purpose about the strategy an organization should pursue in a given market or industry. It provides clear indications on all the factors likely to affect an organization both from the inside-out and outside-in perspectives.

The SWOT model will help an organization match its internal capabilities and resources with the needs and factors inherent to a specific business environment at a particular period in time.

Of importance though, is the fact that the SWOT model will only deliver the expected results when the objectives have been clearly defined prior to embarking on the exercise. As such an organization in the beauty industry could deliberately choose to attract middle age female customers and as such the purpose of the SWOT in this sense will be to identify those internal factors which when matched to external forces allow the organization to critically assess the validity and pertinence of its strategy. According to Van Assen et al (2009) "the model can be used as an instrument for devising and selecting strategy and is equally applicable in any decision making situation, provided the desired objective has been clearly defined".

It goes without saying that the model has been widely discussed and used in numerous business settings and personal situations. Therefore this article attempts to provide a framework centered around some of the most important questions business managers and their team have to reflect on during the SWOT exercise. Although the questions pertaining to SWOT depends on the specific objectives, therefore the questions listed down are just meant to provide an overview of those elements managers have to take into consideration when devising a strategy.

Strengths:

What do customers like about our products, services and processes?

Why do competitors envy us?

What technological advantage(s) do we possess?

Why are we proud of our staff?

Which areas in our system best deliver efficiency to the organization?

Do we have enough resources (financial, human) to meet our objectives?

What can we best use our organizational architecture?

Weaknesses

Why do customers complain about us?

In what areas are we outsmarted by competitors?

What technological advantage(s) should we acquire?

In what areas should we offer training to staff?

What resources do we need?
Which areas of our system should be optimized in our system?
What are areas of improvement in our architecture?

Opportunities

What recent or upcoming economic, cultural, political, technological trend can we take advantage

of?

Are our competitors experiencing difficulties we could take advantage of?

What can the future offer?

Threats

Are we experiencing problems our competitors are taking advantage of?

Does the future appear dim for us?

What recent or upcoming economic, cultural, political, technological should we be wary of?


References


Van Assen Marcel, Van Der Berg Gerben and Pietersma Paul (2009) Key Managements Models: the 60+ models every manager needs to know 2nd Ed Financial Times/Prentice Hall UK


TAM UK profile (2010) Albert S Humpfrey http://www.tamplc.com/Humphsprofile.htm Accessed on the 5th July 2010